Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
How Gaza’s plastic factories are betting on recycling[2016/11/03]
-
The cost of plastic packaging[2016/10/18]
-
Colder weather means it's time for vehicle preparation[2016/10/11]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]